Approved For Release 2002/11/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO1900250002-3
40MOkW/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
ERV SESSION PROCEDURE REPORT
SG1A
WARNING-NOTICE: INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED ---------------
CONTROL NUMBER:
DATE OF SESSION: 2-6 Jun 86
REFERENCES: None
NICKNAME: Other "A"
TARGET COUNTRY: Unknown
SESSION NUMBER: @1, 02, 03
DATE OF REPORT: 31 Jul 86
TECHNIQUE UTILIZED: ERV
MISSION STATUS: Initial/complete
SOURCE IDENTIFIER: 101
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. ( ) TASKING: Initially the interviewer was provided a 3x5 card
on which the following tasking was typed: 11 17 t-110 Mn4n Q'kMQQ f@ uresI and
purpose of the structures at (coordinate)FiLl@@ I In the
two Subsequent sessions the interviewer was provided further verbal tasking
and directions 1@4 i.e., " site is accurate but focus attention on tunnel and
rocket device, '"additional emphasis on purpose of rocket device and relation to
site." Throughout sessions the intern4ewer was never told the exact nature
of the site, its key facilities nor its mis "sion. In the initial session, the
Sourcetwas simply given the coordinates of the site, (encrypted to preclude
inadvertent geographic cueing as per EXtended Remote Viewing(ERV) protocols).
In subsequent sessions, Source was again provided the coordinates and a general
synopsis of previously reported data. No additional specific tasking emphasis or
intentional cueing was prov;ded to Source.
2. ( ) SESSION: During the initial session, Sou 'rce took a "joyride"
to an unspecified site whose descriptive.data did not coincide with the known
da.ta on the site. Source was retargetred, (coordinates repeated) and
successfully acquired the site. In subsequent sessions Source was encourage
to initially take a "joy ride" to a'site of his choosing, (later to be designated
':'Sanctuary") and from that site, at the direction of the interviewer, he was
to move to the target. This technique appeared to eliminate inadvertent
@eporting on non-related targets and was* enjoyable to the Source, therefore,
.he use of "Sanctuary" targetting will continue on a trial basis to Aermine
@ts affect on the Source's success rate.
SUMMARY: The following is coVlation of the raw and unevaluated
data provided by Source during the total of three sessions conducted on this
target.
a. A fenced complex of buildings and facilities with a feeling
of military involvement. There are numerous scientists and technicians working
at the site. Some areas of the site are above ground, (buililngs and related
facilities), while other areas are underagournd or at least partially under-
ground. Mnay of the buildings appear to be abandoned completely including one
building (next to a railroad track) which may have once been a depot. This
building AWdri~dtFbibRei*giffi-44002)"/481~MFAADP96WMMF%*lOM5WU-T-13t of