Infection (2022) 50:531–536 https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-021-01712-8 CASE REPORT Fatal vaccine‑induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) post Ad26.COV2.S: first documented case outside US Elsa V. C. Rodriguez1 Patrice Jissendi Tchofo5 Manuel Cliquennois8  · Fatima‑Zohra Bouazza1  · Magali Bartiaux1  · Nicolas Dauby2  · Camille Sirjacques6  · François Mullier3  · Alain Roman6  · Stéphanie d’Otreppe4 ·  · Cédric Hermans7  · Received: 14 June 2021 / Accepted: 1 October 2021 / Published online: 9 October 2021 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021 Abstract Purpose We reported the first described post Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen, Johnson & Johnson) vaccine-induced immune throm- bocytopenia (VITT) case outside US.  Case description CA young woman without any medical history presented association of deep vein thrombosis and throm- bocytopenia at day 10 after vaccine injection. The patient was treated with low-molecular weight heparin at a first medical institution. Twelve days post Ad26.COV2.S vaccination, the patient was admitted at our hospital for neurological deteriora- tion and right hemiplegia. Medical imaging using MRI showed thrombosis of the major anterior part of the sagittal superior sinus with bilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhagic complications. Screening tests for antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin by rapid lateral flow immunoassay and chemiluminescence techniques were negative. Platelet activation test using heparin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry confirmed the initial clinical hypothesis. Despite immediate treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, dexamethasone, danaparoid and attempted neurosurgery the patient evolved toward brain death. Conclusion Even though it is an extremely rare complication of vaccination physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion of VITT in patients who received an adenovirus-vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within the last 30 days with persistent complains compatible with VITT or thromboembolic event associated with thrombocytopenia. The diagnosis should not be excluded if the rapid anti-PF4 immunological nor chemiluminescence techniques yield negative results. An adapted functional assay should be performed to confirm the diagnosis. Early treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and non-heparin anticoagulants is essential as delayed diagnosis and administration of appropriate treatment is associated with poor prognosis. Keywords COVID-19 · Vaccine · Ad26.COV2.S · Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia · VITT · Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome · TTS · Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis · Thrombosis Elsa V. C. Rodriguez and Fatima-Zohra Bouazza Bouazza contributes equally as co-first authors. * Manuel Cliquennois manuel.cliquennois@gmail.com 1 Department of Emergency Medicine, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium 2 Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium 3 Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Yvoir, Belgium 4 Department of Laboratory Medicine, LHUB-ULB, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium 5 Department of Radiology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium 6 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium 7 Division of Hematology, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium 8 Department of Clinical Hematology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Haute 322, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3 532 Introduction Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) also described as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) has emerged as a very rare complication of adenovec- tor-based immunization [1–6]. VITT was initially described with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AstraZeneca) during its deployment in Europe [3]. Recent reports from the US have highlighted the risk of VITT with the Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen, Johnson & Johnson) [1, 7, 8]. The Ad26.COV2.S vaccine is a replication-incompetent COVID-19 vaccine requiring only one administration that has demonstrated effi- cacy in the prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 [9]. It has been emergency-used approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on February 27th 2021 and received a conditional marketing authorization by the European Medi- cines Agency (EMA) on March 11th 2021 [7, 8]. We describe a case of extensive cerebral thrombosis asso- ciated with severe thrombocytopenia that resembled autoim- mune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a patient who had received the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. At our knowledge this is the first described post Ad26.COV2.S VITT case out- side US. Case presentation A 37-year-old female patient with no previous medical his- tory (notably no personal or familial thromboembolic event, no estrogen-progestogen contraception, no tobacco intoxi- cation, any other vascular risk factor) received a first dose of Ad26.COV2.S vaccine at day #0 (D0). Seven days after vaccination (D7), she consulted the emergency department of a first medical institution. Complains included headache, myalgia and fever. Hematologic results showed a normal platelet count. She was discharged after physical and bio- logical examination. On day #10 (D10) post-vaccination, the patient consulted again at the same institution with persistent headaches and onset of left leg pain. Doppler ultrasound showed left pop- liteal vein thrombosis. SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing by naso- pharyngeal swab was negative. The patient was discharged and treated with therapeutic doses of subcutaneous low- molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (tinzaparin subcuta- neous 10.000 U/day) and elastic compression stockings. A subsequent review of the file identified a thrombocytopenia at 25 × 109/L at this time. At day #12 post-vaccination (D12), at midnight, the patient suffered left hemicranial headache and vomiting episodes at home. During the night (4 a.m.), the patient presented with right hemiplegia and hemineglect. She was assisted by the emergency medical service. A left mydriasis E. V. C. Rodriguez et al. was noted during transport to the hospital. A cranial com- puted tomography (CT) scan was immediately performed after admission to our institution’s emergency department. The CT scan showed multiple bilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhagic areas. A carotid angio-CT showed no aneu- rysm, arteriovenous malformation or arterial thrombo- sis. The patient presented with altered consciousness that evolved quickly to coma. She was intubated at D12 5 a.m. and provided with mechanical ventilation. The biological assays carried out on arrival in the emer- gency room at D12 showed thrombocytopenia at 50 × 109/L, confirmed at 40 × 109/L on citrate, reduced prothrombin time (60% [70–130]), low fibrinogen (1.01 g/L [1.5–4.0]), and elevated D-Dimer level (> 35,000 ng/mL). ß HCG assay was negative. SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing by nasopharyngeal swab was negative. Testing for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies by rapid lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert® HIT, Diag- nostica Stago SAS, Asnières sur Seine, France) and chemi- luminescence (HemosIL® AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H), Instru- mentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA), was therefore, requested in the context of vaccination followed by thrombo- sis with thrombocytopenia. Both tests were negative. Because of a high suspicion of VITT, intravenous immu- noglobulin (IVIG) were initiated in the emergency room at a dose of 1 g/kg/day (D12 post-vaccination, at 7 a.m.). A brain MRI was performed and showed a superior sagittal sinus thrombosis at the vertex (Fig. 1A) and a large intra–extra axial hemorrhagic collection with left lateral intraventricu- lar hemorrhage (Fig. 1B), complicated by diffuse oedema (Fig. 1C). Immediately after the MRI at D12 8.30 a.m., the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit where she received intravenous therapeutic dose of danaparoid sodium as initial bolus followed by continuous infusion, and 40 mg of intravenous dexamethasone. Subsequently, the patient rapidly developed central dia- betes insipidus (D12 1 p.m.) which required treatment with desmopressin 4 µg intravenous. Bilateral fixed mydriasis appeared at D12 4 p.m. which justified the administration of 15 g of mannitol. Before an external ventricular shunt and intracranial pressure monitoring implementation, an 8.1011 platelets transfusion was infused. The patient was declared brain dead the day after her admission (day #13 post-vaccination). A summary of the case presentation and management is reported in Fig. 2, illustrating the fulminant course of the illness. Patient consent for an organ donation procedure was obtained from the family. However, due to the potential risk of transmission of VITT and after multidisciplinary consul- tation, decision was made not to proceed to organ donation. As previously described [10], a functional assay was performed with a heparin-induced multiple-electrode aggregometry (HIMEA) on a multiplate analyzer (Roche) and confirmed VITT. In VITT, platelet aggregation already 1 3 533 Fig. 1 Magnetic resonance imaging on day #12 post-vaccination. The sagittal view of the 3D Phase contrast venous angiography a shows the thrombosis of the major anterior part of the sagittal superior sinus (arrows). As the consequence of it, on B0 Diffusion weighted image b multiple bilateral hemorrhagic collections are seen and on apparent diffusion coefficient map c the extensive cytotoxic oedema involves almost the whole left hemisphere and partly the right one occurred in absence of heparin. A positive VITT result requires a sigmoid curve in absence of heparin. High dose heparin resulting in an AUC reduction with > 50% of the condition without any heparin (Fig. 3). In addition, pres- ence of anti-PF4 antibodies was confirmed using an enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) with immobilized polyvinyl sulfonate/PF4 complexes (Lifecodes PF4 IgG, Immucor Lifecodes, Jette, Belgium) which has proven to be very sensitive for the detection of anti-PF4 of TTS fol- lowing SARS-CoV-2 vaccination [11]. With this test, the optical density (OD) was strongly positive at 2.7 (positivity threshold: 0.4). Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first VITT documented case outside US following Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. We offer a detailed description of a rare and life-threatening complication with a fulminant evolution. The interim safety data from more than 200.000 participants vaccinated with Ad26.COV2.S in South Africa were recently reported [12]. No case of VITT has been documented in the Sisonke study (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04838795). Apart from this case, all VITT cases reported in Europe involved only patients who had received the AstraZeneca adenovirus vector-based vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. In European Union 142 cases of VITT have been reported to EudraVigilance out of 18 million ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated persons, as of April 13th 2021. In the United Kingdom 332 cases of VITT have been reported out of 24.2 million vaccinated persons, as of May 19th 2021. Up to May 25th 2021, The VITT cases observed with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 mainly involved young women [1]. Current guide- lines in the UK recommend administering the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in adults aged above 40 years old based on aged- based risk–benefit analysis. Following this first post-Ad26. COV2.S VITT case, Belgium recommended on May 26th Fatal vaccine‑induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) post Ad26.COV2.S: first… 1 3 534 E. V. C. Rodriguez et al. Fig. 2 Time line summarizing the evolution, findings and management of the case Heparin concentration 0 IU/mL CUA 843 1 IU/mL 19 385 IU/mL 72 Fig. 3 Results of the functional assay (HIMEA): aggregation of plate- lets (from a good responder) after incubation with plasma from the patients was measured by whole-blood impedance aggregometry. The measurements were performed in absence of added heparin (left side) and in the presence of low (1 IU/ml middle) or high (385 IU/ml right side) heparin concentrations. The red and blue lines represent dupli- cate measurements. AU denotes arbitrary units, and AUC the area under the curve the administration of Ad26.COV2.S only in adults aged above 41 years. The identification of 6 VITT cases among 6.8 millions of doses in the US led to a temporary suspension of vaccination using Ad26.COV2.S on April 13th 2021. The use of Ad26. COV2.S was resumed on April 23rd 2021. FDA considered the vaccine to be safe and VITT extremely rare [7]. As of May 7th 2021 with an exposure of 8.7 million doses admin- istered, 28 confirmed thrombotic thrombocytopenia post- Ad26.COV2.S vaccine administration were reported in US. According to the FDA the patients affected by VITT after Ad26.COV2.S were only women with an average age of 37 years (range 18–59) [7]. Symptoms appeared 5–16 days post-vaccination. 1 3 The precise mechanisms of VITT are currently unknown. However, the fact that this rare complication is only observed with adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccine points toward an abnormal immune response to the vector [2, 13]. The initial clinical presentation combining headache, myalgia and fever is frequently reported and benign after COVID-19 vaccination. Unfortunately at the time of lower limb thrombosis diagnosis, the association with severe thrombocytopenia was not identified immediately as a pos- sible VITT leading to a delay in the appropriate care. This highlights the importance of appropriate information to first-line healthcare workers and the need of a low thresh- old for diagnosis in case of any compatible symptoms (i.e. severe headaches) in case of recent vaccination with an adenovirus vector-based vaccine. The results of both rapid and chemiluminescence anti- PF4 assays were negative. Recent report has highlighted the low sensitivity (STic Expert HIT, one out of the 23 reported cases; Acustar, two out of the 49 reported cases) of anti-PF4 rapid immunoassays in cases of suspected VITT, including the Acustar test used in the present case [11, 14]. This contrasts with the good performance of this assays reported in “classical” HIT [15]. Twelve US cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with thrombocyto- penia after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination were reported [8]. All but one (test not done) were tested positive for anti- PF4 antibodies by ELISA but the type of ELISA was not provided in the report [8] despite its impact on the per- formance [11, 14, 16]. Only one case out of nine tested was confirmed by serotonin release assay (SRA) which illustrate that methodology should be adapted and thus provided to be sensitive to VITT [8]. Our case illustrates that clinicians should not rely on rapid anti-PF4 testing and that management should be based on the combination of hematological (thrombocy- topenia) and clinical parameters in the context of recent adenovirus-vector-based COVID-19 vaccination. Rapid functional assays such as HIMEA must be carried out by an expert center quickly (in less than 24 h) [17]. Current guidelines recommend against the use of unfractionated heparin or LMWH. Given the similarity between VITT and HIT’s immune responses, there is a possibility that heparin may amplify platelet activation [6, 18]. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) could be used in noncritically ill patients. Parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., bivalirudin and argatroban) or danaparoid or fondaparinux are recommended, as these have been used in patients with HIT [6]. These patients should also be monitored in hospital in case of compatible symptoms. In the setting of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, even with hemorrhagic complication, anticoagulant therapy is recommended [19]. 535 Intravenous immunoglobulin are considered to be stand- ard of care of severe VITT and should be administered urgently, to reduce the platelet activation by the anti-PF4 antibodies [2, 6, 18]. Corticosteroids, like dexamethasone, should be considered, in life threatening disease and/or if IVIG administration is delayed [2, 6]. The patient was considered for organ donation. This raises the issue of anti-PF4 antibody transfer to the organ transplant recipient and the risk for the graft outcome and recipient health. Previous limited experience with pre- transplant HIT in donors suggest low thrombo-embolic risk in solid-organ transplant recipients [20, 21]. Conclusion Physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion of VITT in patients who received an adenovirus-vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within the last 30 days with persis- tent complains compatible with VITT. The clinical find- ings of VITT are similar to HIT, but rapid immunoassays for HIT often appear as false negative in patients with VITT. The diagnosis should not be excluded if the rapid anti-PF4 immunological nor chemiluminescence tech- niques yield negative results. An adapted functional assay should be performed to confirm the diagnosis. For patients with active bleeding or ongoing thrombosis, an early treat- ment with intravenous immunoglobulin and dexametha- sone is essential as delayed diagnosis and administration of appropriate treatment is associated with poor prognosis. Heparin should not be used; instead, non-heparin antico- agulants, such as bivalirudin and argatroban, danaparoid, fondaparinux or direct oral anticoagulants should be given. More research is needed on the impact pre-organ donation VITT on solid organ transplant recipient outcome. Funding Not applicable. Availability of data and material (data transparency) Not applicable. Code availability (software application or custom code) Not applicable. Declarations Conflict of interest (include appropriate disclosures) The authors de- clare no conflicts of interest. ND reports personal fees from Roche and Boehringer-Ingelheim, and non-financial support from Pfizer, Janssen, and Merck Sharp & Dohme, outside the submitted work. Ethics approval (include appropriate approvals or waivers) Not appli- cable. Consent to participate (include appropriate statements) Not applica- ble. Fatal vaccine‑induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) post Ad26.COV2.S: first… 1 3 536 E. V. C. Rodriguez et al. Consent for publication (include appropriate statements) Family gives consent for publication of anonymous case report. References 1. Muir K-L, Kallam A, Koepsell SA, Gundabolu K. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1964–5. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMc 21058 69. 2. Dotan A, Shoenfeld Y. Perspectives on vaccine induced throm- botic thrombocytopenia. J Autoimmun. 2021;121: 102663. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jaut. 2021. 102663. 3. Greinacher A, Thiele T, Warkentin TE, Weisser K, Kyrle PA, Eichinger S. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2092–101. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMo a2104 840. 4. COVID-19 vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S [recombinant]). Summary of product characteristics n.d. https:// www. ema. europa. eu/ en/ docum ents/ produ ct- infor mation/ covid- 19- vacci ne- janss en- epar- produ ct- infor mation_ en. pdf. Accessed 9 Aug 2021. 5. Cines DB, Bussel JB. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2254–6. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMe 21063 15. 6. World Health Organization. Guidance for clinical case manage- ment of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) fol- lowing vaccination to prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) 2021. https:// www. who. int/ publi catio ns/i/ item/ WHO- 2019- nCoV- TTS- 2021.1. Accessed 9 Aug 2021. 7. MacNeil JR, Su JR, Broder KR, Guh AY, Gargano JW, Wallace M, et al. Updated recommendations from the advisory committee on immunization practices for use of the Janssen (Johnson & John- son) COVID-19 Vaccine After reports of thrombosis with throm- bocytopenia syndrome among vaccine recipients—United States, April 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:651–6. https:// doi. org/ 10. 15585/ mmwr. mm701 7e4. 8. See I, Su JR, Lale A, Woo EJ, Guh AY, Shimabukuro TT, et al. US case reports of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with throm- bocytopenia after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination, March 2 to April 21, 2021. JAMA. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ jama. 2021. 7517. 9. Sadoff J, Gray G, Vandebosch A, Cárdenas V, Shukarev G, Grin- sztejn B, et al. Safety and efficacy of single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMo a2101 544. 10. Morel-Kopp M-C, Mullier F, Gkalea V, Bakchoul T, Minet V, Elalamy I, et al. Heparin-induced multi-electrode aggregometry method for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia testing: com- munication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:2548–52. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jth. 13516. 11. Vayne C, Rollin J, Gruel Y, Pouplard C, Galinat H, Huet O, et al. PF4 immunoassays in vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocyto- penia. N Engl J Med. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMc 21063 83. 12. Takuva S, Takalani A, Garrett N, Goga A, Peter J, Louw V, et al. Thromboembolic events in the South African Ad26.COV2.S vac- cine study. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:570–1. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMc 21079 20. 13. Douxfils J, Favresse J, Dogné J-M, Lecompte T, Susen S, Cordon- nier C, et al. Hypotheses behind the very rare cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Thromb Res. 2021;203:163–71. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. throm res. 2021. 05. 010. 14. Platton S, Bartlett A, MacCallum P, Makris M, McDonald V, Singh D, et al. Evaluation of laboratory assays for anti-platelet fac- tor 4 antibodies after ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 vaccination. J Thromb Haemost. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jth. 15362. 15. Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA-I, Linkins L-A, Arnold DM, Nazy I. High sensitivity and specificity of an automated IgG-specific chemiluminescence immunoassay for diagnosis of HIT. Blood. 2018;132:1345–9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1182/ blood- 2018- 04- 847483. 16. Scully M, Singh D, Lown R, Poles A, Solomon T, Levi M, et al. Pathologic antibodies to platelet factor 4 after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMo a2105 385. 17. Elalamy I, Gerotziafas G, Alamowitch S, Laroche J-P, van Dreden P, Ageno W, et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and thrombo- sis: expert opinions. Thromb Haemost. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1055/a- 1499- 0119. 18. McCrae KR. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia due to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Cleve Clin J Med. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3949/ ccjm. 88a. ccc078. 19. Ropper AH, Klein JP. Cerebral venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:59–64. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMr a2106 545. 20. Assfalg V, Hüser N. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in solid organ transplant recipients: the current scientific knowledge. World J Transplant. 2016;6:165. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5500/ wjt. v6. i1. 165. 21. NHS Blood and Transplant. Organ donation and transplantation from patients with vaccine induced thrombosis and thrombocyto- penia (VITT) n.d. https:// nhsbt dbe. blob. core. windo ws. net/ umbra co- assets- corp/ 23602/ inf15 69. pdf. Accessed 9 Aug 2021. 1 3