the title is really important his main proposal about intuition is that intuition is what we get what what results from implicit learning so when i when i'm picking up on implicit patterns i don't know that i'm doing it it's it's not explicit right but i nevertheless i'm getting i'm picking up on a pattern and people will start to make judgments about their patterns they'll have intuitions so to just use com you know non-controversial examples you'll go into a particular context and you know how far to stand away from how far or close to stand to various people in the room now you you probably never went to explicit standing room school okay if the person is two notches of status above you and this is a funeral you stand this distance away but if they're the same level of you you stand here if they're two notches about you and you're at a backyard party then you're allowed to be like nobody taught you that and right you probably can't even remember that but you know it and you know it by you feel wrong if you're standing too far or close for somebody in a particular context you get an intuition as we say now when we like it we call it intuition we don't like it we call it bias or prejudice but it's the same sort of thing you're implicit learning now here's the problem there's two problems with implicit learning so that's why he called it educating intuition the two problems are implicit learning only it doesn't distinguish it just picks up on any complex pattern so it doesn't distinguish correlational patterns from actual causal patterns and that's why you can pick up on the patterns for like how far you should stand at a party but it can also pick up on weird correlations you know that make might make you a racist or a bigot right and so it doesn't distinguish well correlation from causal patterns and secondly it's it it only picks up it it can only be generated by patterns that you've you've experienced it doesn't consider possible patterns okay okay now how do we improve implicit learning so that we get better