> Chapter 3 > Chapter 4 > Chapter 5 > Chapter 6 > Chapter 7 > Chapter 8 > Chapter 9 > Chapter 10 > Chapter 11 > Chapter 12 > Chapter 13 > Chapter 14 > Chapter 15 > Chapter 16 > Chapter 17 > Chapter 18 > Chapter 19 > Chapter 20 > Chapter 21 > Chapter 22 > Chapter 23 > Chapter 24 > Chapter 25 > Chapter 26 > Chapter 27 > Chapter 28 > Chapter 29 > Chapter 30 > Chapter 31 > Chapter 32 > Chapter 33 > Chapter 34 > Chapter 35 > Chapter 36 > Chapter 37 > Chapter 38 > Chapter 39 > Chapters 40-42 > Chapter 43 > Chapter 44 > Chapters 45-46 > Chapters 47-48 >
Chapter 2: His call as a prophet: The vision told Ez to stand on
his feet. Son of man, it said, I am sending you to Israel, a nation of rebels. The picture is dismal. Already in Dt. 8.4-6:"Do not say to yourselves....'It is because of my righteousness that God has brought me to possess the land...it is because of the wickedness of these nations that God is going to drive them out before you....you are a stubborn people." And yet, in Dt 7.8: "...it is because the Lord loves you" that He will give you this land. The first thing to notice is that the Lord loves them in spite of their being so rebellious. He will soon speak at more length of their rebelliousness. How then can He love them?. The answer is that love is not a feeling, it is to will good to another for the other's sake. He therefore willed them good, which is first described as the land. Later, near the end of the OT period it will be reinterpreted as eternal salvation. There is something somewhat similar in the NT. In 1 Cor St. Paul argued at length to try to get them out of their pride in being in a special faction within the church, and, we may assume, pride in getting into the Church--unlike those pagans! So Paul at the end of 1 Cor 1 tells them, in effect: Look at your community! Not many rich, not many noble, not many wise or learned. Rather, God has chosen the weak things of the world to confound the strong. Then it will be clear it is His power and goodness, not their good qualities - though Paul does not accuse them of being as rebellious as Israel. In the book of Jonah we find a similar thought. Jonah was sent to the pagan city of Nineveh. If a prophet was sent in OT times to Israel, he was lucky to get out alive. But the pagan Assyrians welcomed the prophet, did penance at once. In a fourth century <Mekillta de Rabbi Ishmael> (tr. J. Lauterbach, Jewish Publication Society I.p.7) Jonah is pictured as saying to himself: "Since the gentiles are more inclined to repent, I might be causing Israel to be condemned [by going to Nineveh]." They knew they were worse than the pagans. In the NT we see he same sort of picture. In the parable of the goods Samaritan (Lk 10.30-37) two officers of the People of God coldly pass by the wounded man. But a Samaritan takes care of him most generously. Similarly, when ten lepers were healed by Jesus, only one came back to say thanks--and he was a Samaritan. In Mt.11.21 Jesus is vexed at the hardness of Chorozain and Bethsaida: "If the wonders done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes." Is there a hint in all of this that the holy people of God are in general less open to God's graces than pagans? In a large family, if most of the children have normal health, but one is sickly, it is the sickly one who gets the extra care. He needs it so much more. So God told Ezekiel not to be rebellious. He would give Ezekiel a scroll with lamentations and woe written on it to eat. He must eat it. Did Ezekiel physically eat a scroll? Much harder to do than for a modern book--and even if Ezekiel had a lot of Taco sauce. Most likely this is a symbolic way of saying: God is now filling you with His spirit and His thoughts, with the result that later, even if Ezekiel did not have a special vision each time, he could rightly say: Thus says the Lord! |